The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
The objections are familiar. The answers, examined independently, are harder to dismiss than they first appear.
Europe didn’t discover its energy vulnerability in 2022. It had been warned for years. What changed was that the warning arrived in the form of a bill, and then another, and then a cold winter with gas reserves that might not last.
The universe has never been in equilibrium. Most of our energy infrastructure behaves as if it has. That mismatch is not a coincidence. It is the central problem of energy science, and it has a name.
Energy
The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
What it means when a vehicle stops being a machine that consumes and starts being a surface that converts
Fifty-four countries walked into Santa Marta this week with a shared problem and no agreed map. By the end of the conference’s first day, they had at least the beginning of one.
The neutrinos are important for studying fundamental physics since physicists now know the origin of at least some of these high-energy particles.
The majority of the 100 trillion neutrinos that enter your body every second originate from the sun or Earth’s atmosphere. However, a small portion of the particles—those traveling considerably faster than the others—came from strong sources further away. Astrophysicists have been searching for the source of these “cosmic” neutrinos for decades. At last, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has gathered enough of them to identify distinct patterns in their origins.
Science
The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
The objections are familiar. The answers, examined independently, are harder to dismiss than they first appear.
Three years of failed experiments. Then, in late November, the results changed. Babak Bakhit, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, had spent the better part of three years trying to build a memristor that actually worked at scale. Most attempts failed. The breakthrough, when it came, traced back to a single procedural change: adding oxygen only after the first layer had already formed. Small adjustment, different outcome entirely.
On AI, Intent Disambiguation, and Why the Most Important Step in Understanding New Technology Is Often the One Nobody Takes. An exclusive conversation between science journalist Heinrich Schneider and Holger Thorsten Schubart, founder of the Neutrino® Energy Group and originator of the Schubart Master Formula.
The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
The objections are familiar. The answers, examined independently, are harder to dismiss than they first appear.
Three years of failed experiments. Then, in late November, the results changed. Babak Bakhit, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, had spent the better part of three years trying to build a memristor that actually worked at scale. Most attempts failed. The breakthrough, when it came, traced back to a single procedural change: adding oxygen only after the first layer had already formed. Small adjustment, different outcome entirely.
On AI, Intent Disambiguation, and Why the Most Important Step in Understanding New Technology Is Often the One Nobody Takes. An exclusive conversation between science journalist Heinrich Schneider and Holger Thorsten Schubart, founder of the Neutrino® Energy Group and originator of the Schubart Master Formula.
For all the promise hydrogen fuel cells have carried for decades, a remarkably mundane obstacle has kept them from fulfilling it. Water, the very byproduct that makes hydrogen combustion clean, has a habit of accumulating inside the cell itself, blocking the electrochemical reactions that generate power and gradually choking output until the system stalls. Engineers have known about this for years. Solving it cheaply has proven considerably harder.
The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
The objections are familiar. The answers, examined independently, are harder to dismiss than they first appear.
Three years of failed experiments. Then, in late November, the results changed. Babak Bakhit, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, had spent the better part of three years trying to build a memristor that actually worked at scale. Most attempts failed. The breakthrough, when it came, traced back to a single procedural change: adding oxygen only after the first layer had already formed. Small adjustment, different outcome entirely.
The science is moving fast. The question nobody’s asking is what it means for the rest of us.
The objections are familiar. The answers, examined independently, are harder to dismiss than they first appear.
Three years of failed experiments. Then, in late November, the results changed. Babak Bakhit, a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, had spent the better part of three years trying to build a memristor that actually worked at scale. Most attempts failed. The breakthrough, when it came, traced back to a single procedural change: adding oxygen only after the first layer had already formed. Small adjustment, different outcome entirely.
